IMF Executive Board Concludes 2016 Article IV Consultation with Bolivia
December 22, 2016
On December 9, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation[1] with Bolivia.
Boosted by the commodity boom, Bolivia has experienced substantial economic and social progress. Growth has been strong, averaging around 5 percent since 2006, and poverty has fallen by a third. During this time, the authorities built up sizable buffers and de-dollarized the financial system to a major extent. However, with Bolivia remaining one of the most commodity-dependent countries in the region, sharply lower commodity prices pose challenges to the implementation of the authorities’ development objectives laid out in their Patriotic Agenda 2025. To advance their plans, the authorities are using their policy buffers, with the sizable fiscal and external surpluses that prevailed over the past decade now turning to large twin deficits.
Real GDP growth is projected at 3.7 percent in 2016, which is still relatively strong by regional standards. A continued supportive fiscal policy and rapid credit growth linked to the Financial Services Law are buttressing activity and offsetting a major drought and temporary supply shocks in gas production. However, the fiscal and external current account deficits will remain wide. In the medium term, growth is expected to converge towards 3.5 percent, consistent with the new commodity price normal, amid persistent twin deficits. Risks to this outlook are tilted to the downside, with the potential for additional weakness in key emerging markets, further dollar strength, and a larger-than-expected impact of the drought. Longer-term uncertainties relate to future oil prices, the extent of natural gas discoveries and export contract renewals, and the possibility of an excessive credit growth volatility.
Executive Board Assessment[2]
Executive Directors commended the Bolivian authorities for the sound macroeconomic management and poverty reduction during the past commodity boom. While slowing, real GDP growth is projected to remain robust in 2016, on the back of a sizable public investment program and strong credit growth. Looking ahead, Directors concurred that the outlook appears increasingly challenging, with risks tilted to the downside, owing to continued low commodity prices and growing fiscal and external imbalances. Given the still sizable buffers, they encouraged the authorities to plan a carefully measured approach to adjusting to the less favorable external environment.
Directors underscored the risks arising from Bolivia’s large and widening fiscal deficits. They encouraged the authorities to improve the non-hydrocarbons primary balance through streamlining expenditures while increasing their efficiency. Directors recommended an early transition to a credible medium-term fiscal framework to continue to assure debt sustainability, while also accounting for the state of the business cycle and building cushions to absorb volatility in hydrocarbon prices. They advised the authorities to ensure the financial health of state-owned enterprises, exercise greater oversight of their activities, and strengthen the evaluation and transparency of their investments.
Directors stressed the merits of enhancing the independence of the central bank, and advised phasing out the central bank’s exposures to the state-owned enterprises to avoid potential conflicts with the commitment to price stability. Most Directors encouraged consideration of gradually permitting greater exchange rate flexibility, which along with structural reforms, would improve competitiveness, facilitate the adjustment to lower commodity prices, and protect against possible future external shocks.
Directors welcomed the overall soundness of the financial sector, and encouraged the authorities to address the growing vulnerabilities. They considered that the quotas and interest caps set under the Financial Services Law appear to be inducing banks to expand credit rapidly, which could lead to greater risks and undermine financial inclusion. Directors suggested that the authorities modify key provisions of the regulations to reduce distortions and avoid an unnecessary buildup of risk. They saw scope for the authorities to utilize more market-oriented mechanisms to achieve greater financial inclusion.
Directors agreed that accelerating structural reforms and improving the business climate are central to improving medium-term growth prospects. They encouraged the authorities to improve incentives for hydrocarbons exploration, bring wages back in line with productivity, and address the severe water shortage.
Directors praised the authorities for the significant declines in inequality and poverty achieved over the last decade, which should be preserved. They considered that better targeting and improved efficiency of social spending could help mitigate the negative impact of lower commodity prices on inequality and poverty.
Bolivia: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators |
|
|||||||||||||
I. Social and Demographic Indicators |
|
|||||||||||||
GDP per capita (U.S. dollars, 2015) |
2,900 |
Poverty headcount ratio (percent of population, 2015) |
38.6 |
|
||||||||||
Population (millions, 2015) |
11.5 |
Gini index (2015) |
47.0 |
|
||||||||||
Life expectancy at birth (years, 2014) |
68 |
Adult literacy rate (percent, 2015) |
95.1 |
|
||||||||||
Infant mortality rate (per thousand, 2015) |
30.6 |
Net primary education enrollment rate (2011) |
82.2 |
|
||||||||||
II. Economic Indicators |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline projections |
|
|||||||
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
|
|
Income and prices |
|
|||||||||||||
Real GDP |
4.1 |
5.2 |
5.1 |
6.8 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|
|
Real GDP excluding hydrocarbons |
3.5 |
5.0 |
4.4 |
6.2 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
|
|
GDP deflator |
8.8 |
14.6 |
7.1 |
6.0 |
2.0 |
-4.6 |
-2.0 |
7.1 |
5.2 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
4.7 |
|
|
CPI inflation (period average) |
2.5 |
9.9 |
4.5 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
CPI inflation (end-of-period) |
7.2 |
6.9 |
4.5 |
6.5 |
5.2 |
3.0 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Investment and savings |
|
|||||||||||||
Total investment |
17.0 |
19.8 |
17.7 |
19.0 |
21.0 |
19.2 |
20.9 |
19.1 |
18.0 |
17.3 |
16.5 |
15.8 |
|
|
Public sector |
9.5 |
10.5 |
10.5 |
11.3 |
12.4 |
13.5 |
13.5 |
12.2 |
11.5 |
11.0 |
10.3 |
9.8 |
|
|
Private sector |
7.1 |
8.4 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
8.6 |
7.8 |
7.2 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
6.0 |
|
|
Stockbuilding |
0.4 |
0.8 |
-0.7 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
-2.1 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Gross domestic savings |
23.9 |
25.5 |
27.1 |
26.0 |
22.4 |
13.2 |
11.9 |
14.0 |
14.4 |
14.8 |
14.4 |
14.3 |
|
|
Gross national savings |
25.0 |
25.6 |
25.7 |
23.9 |
20.5 |
13.2 |
12.8 |
14.1 |
14.1 |
14.4 |
13.9 |
13.8 |
|
|
Public sector |
11.1 |
11.4 |
12.3 |
12.0 |
10.1 |
6.6 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
5.6 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
|
|
Private sector |
13.9 |
14.2 |
13.4 |
11.9 |
10.4 |
6.6 |
7.4 |
8.6 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
|
Saving/investment balances 1/ |
8.0 |
5.8 |
8.1 |
4.9 |
-0.6 |
-6.1 |
-8.1 |
-5.0 |
-4.0 |
-2.9 |
-2.6 |
-2.0 |
|
|
Public sector |
1.7 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
0.7 |
-2.3 |
-6.9 |
-8.1 |
-6.7 |
-6.2 |
-5.4 |
-5.3 |
-5.0 |
|
|
Private sector |
6.7 |
5.8 |
5.6 |
4.2 |
1.8 |
-1.3 |
0.2 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
|
|
Combined public sector |
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues and grants |
33.2 |
36.2 |
37.8 |
39.1 |
39.9 |
37.7 |
35.0 |
35.2 |
34.5 |
34.6 |
33.9 |
33.6 |
|
|
Of which: Hydrocarbon related revenue |
10.2 |
11.4 |
13.0 |
13.5 |
12.7 |
9.1 |
6.4 |
6.8 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
5.6 |
5.5 |
|
|
Expenditure |
31.5 |
35.4 |
36.0 |
38.4 |
43.3 |
44.6 |
43.0 |
41.9 |
40.7 |
40.1 |
39.2 |
38.6 |
|
|
Current |
22.8 |
24.2 |
25.1 |
24.9 |
28.2 |
29.1 |
27.8 |
27.8 |
27.5 |
27.4 |
27.3 |
27.3 |
|
|
Capital 2/ |
8.7 |
11.2 |
11.0 |
13.5 |
15.0 |
15.5 |
15.2 |
14.1 |
13.2 |
12.6 |
11.9 |
11.3 |
|
|
Overall balance after nationalization costs |
1.7 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
0.7 |
-3.4 |
-6.9 |
-8.1 |
-6.7 |
-6.2 |
-5.4 |
-5.3 |
-5.0 |
|
|
Of which: |
|
|||||||||||||
Non-hydrocarbon balance, before nationalization costs |
-8.1 |
-9.6 |
-9.7 |
-11.1 |
-13.2 |
-14.1 |
-12.2 |
-11.4 |
-10.2 |
-9.7 |
-9.0 |
-8.6 |
|
|
Total gross NFPS debt 3/ |
38.5 |
35.7 |
35.7 |
36.1 |
37.0 |
40.6 |
46.7 |
47.6 |
48.8 |
49.4 |
51.2 |
52.0 |
|
|
NFPS deposits |
20.8 |
21.4 |
24.2 |
24.0 |
20.3 |
16.6 |
15.1 |
12.4 |
10.3 |
8.5 |
7.9 |
7.3 |
|
|
External sector |
|
|||||||||||||
Current account 1/ |
3.9 |
0.3 |
7.2 |
2.4 |
0.2 |
-5.8 |
-7.6 |
-4.7 |
-3.8 |
-2.9 |
-2.6 |
-2.3 |
|
|
Merchandise exports |
32.4 |
34.6 |
41.3 |
37.9 |
37.0 |
25.0 |
21.0 |
21.8 |
20.5 |
20.3 |
19.3 |
18.5 |
|
|
Of which: natural gas |
14.1 |
16.1 |
20.1 |
19.8 |
18.1 |
11.3 |
7.0 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
6.6 |
6.3 |
|
|
Merchandise imports |
28.3 |
32.8 |
31.4 |
31.4 |
31.6 |
29.1 |
27.5 |
25.4 |
23.4 |
22.6 |
21.1 |
20.0 |
|
|
Capital and financial account |
0.8 |
8.6 |
-0.9 |
1.2 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
-0.4 |
-0.6 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
Of which: direct investment net |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
5.7 |
1.9 |
4.1 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
|
|
Overall balance of payments |
4.7 |
8.9 |
6.3 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
-4.9 |
-8.0 |
-5.4 |
-3.8 |
-2.6 |
-2.4 |
-2.3 |
|
|
Terms of trade index (percent change) |
-11.1 |
58.0 |
7.3 |
0.0 |
-2.2 |
-16.3 |
-10.1 |
9.5 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
-1.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
Net Central Bank foreign reserves 4/ 5/ |
|
|||||||||||||
In millions of U.S. dollars |
9,730 |
12,019 |
13,927 |
14,430 |
15,123 |
13,056 |
10,344 |
8,330 |
6,721 |
5,570 |
4,442 |
3,945 |
|
|
In percent of broad money |
80.0 |
83.0 |
80.0 |
71.4 |
64.7 |
48.1 |
36.5 |
26.4 |
19.5 |
14.8 |
10.9 |
8.8 |
|
|
Exchange rates 6/ |
|
|||||||||||||
Bolivianos/U.S. dollar (end-of-period) |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
|
REER, period average (percent change) |
-4.9 |
1.9 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
7.9 |
0.1 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
|
Money and credit |
|
|||||||||||||
Credit to the private sector |
19.9 |
23.0 |
19.4 |
18.9 |
15.0 |
17.6 |
17.5 |
15.2 |
11.0 |
10.5 |
9.5 |
10.0 |
|
|
Credit to the private sector (percent of GDP) |
36.0 |
36.8 |
39.0 |
40.9 |
43.7 |
51.5 |
59.5 |
61.6 |
62.8 |
63.9 |
64.9 |
65.7 |
|
|
Broad money |
12.5 |
17.7 |
20.2 |
16.2 |
15.6 |
16.2 |
4.5 |
11.1 |
9.3 |
9.1 |
8.6 |
9.2 |
|
|
Interest rates (percent, end-of-period) |
|
|||||||||||||
Deposits (effective rate) |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
|
Lending (effective rate) |
10.4 |
10.8 |
10.6 |
11.4 |
8.0 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
|
U.S. dollar and dollar-indexed deposits (in percent of total deposits) |
43.8 |
34.5 |
26.3 |
21.0 |
17.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
|
|
U.S. dollar and dollar indexed credit (in percent of total credit) |
38.6 |
30.7 |
21.3 |
15.8 |
10.2 |
8.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
Memorandum items: |
|
|||||||||||||
Nominal GDP (in billions of U.S. dollars) |
19.8 |
24.1 |
27.3 |
30.9 |
33.2 |
33.2 |
33.8 |
37.6 |
40.9 |
44.4 |
47.9 |
52.0 |
|
|
Oil prices (in U.S. dollars per barrel) |
79.0 |
104.0 |
105.0 |
104.1 |
96.2 |
50.8 |
43.0 |
50.6 |
53.1 |
54.4 |
56.3 |
58.0 |
|
|
Sources: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances, Central Bank of Bolivia, National Institute of Statistics, UDAPE, and Fund staff calculations. 1/ The discrepancy between the current account and the savings-investment balances reflects methodological differences. For the projection years, the discrepancy is assumed to remain constant in dollar value. 2/ Includes nationalization costs and net lending. 3/ Public debt includes SOE's borrowing from the BCB but not from other domestic institutions. 4/ Excludes reserves from the Latin American Reserve Fund (FLAR) and Offshore Liquidity Requirements (RAL). 5/ All foreign assets valued at market prices. 6/ Official (buy) exchange rate. |
[1] Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.
[2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.
IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS
PRESS OFFICER: Raphael Anspach
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org