Trade Issues in the Doha Round: Dispelling Some Misconceptions
August 1, 2006
Disclaimer: This Policy Dicussion Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate
Summary
The current round of multilateral trade negotiations-the Doha Round-presents an opportunity for countries to reap the benefits of trade liberalization. Unfortunately, a number of misconceptions about the likely impact of trade reforms has, in part, impeded more rapid progress toward completion of the Round. This paper addresses some of the most egregious of these misconceptions and presents results from IMF research that sheds light on these issues. In particular, this paper argues that: (i) developing countries have much to gain from their own trade liberalization; (ii) preference erosion could be significant for some countries, but it is not a justification for postponing tariff reductions; (iii) tariffs applied against agricultural products in rich countries actually harm developing countries more than subsidies; and (iv) a disproportionate share of agricultural subsidies in rich countries goes to large wealthy farmers.
Subject: Export subsidies, Exports, Imports, International trade, National accounts, Personal income, Tariffs, Taxes
Keywords: country, country benefit, developing countries, EU Commissioner, EU consumer, EU market, export, Export subsidies, Exports, government payment, import tariff, importing country, Imports, OECD countries harm, OECD country, payment, PDP, Personal income, preference erosion, preference scheme, Sub-Saharan Africa, subsidies, subsidy, tariff reduction, tariffs, Trade liberalization
Pages:
24
Volume:
2006
DOI:
Issue:
004
Series:
Policy Discussion Paper No. 2006/004
Stock No:
PPIEA2006004
ISBN:
9781451946161
ISSN:
1564-5193






