The Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking Relationships: A Case for Policy Action
June 30, 2016
Preview Citation
Format: Chicago
Disclaimer: This Staff Discussion Note represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent IMF views or IMF policy. The views expressed herein should be attributed to the authors and not to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management. Staff Discussion Notes are published to elicit comments and to further debate.
Summary
Subject: Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT), Balance of payments, Banking, Compliance costs, Correspondent banking, Crime, Financial services, Money laundering, Remittances
Keywords: AML/CFT, Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT), Australia and New Zealand, Bank customer, Banking supervision and regulation, BNP Paribas, Caribbean, Correspondent and respondent banks, Correspondent Banking, Correspondent relationship, De-risking, Due diligence, Global, Money laundering, Money or Value Transfer Services, Money Transfer Operators, Payment systems, Remittances, Respondent bank, Risk assessment, SDN, Technical Assistance, Trade Finance, Withdrawal of CBR
Publication Details
-
Pages:
41
-
Volume:
---
-
DOI:
---
-
Issue:
---
-
Series:
Staff Discussion Notes No. 2016/006
-
Stock No:
SDNEA2016006
-
ISBN:
9781498375092
-
ISSN:
2617-6750