Aid Volatility and Dutch Disease: Is There a Role for Macroeconomic Policies?
IMF Working Papers, June 1, 2006
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Aid Volatility and Dutch Disease: Is There a Role for Macroeconomic Policies?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Thierry Tressel, Alessandro Prati
- Published: June 1, 2006
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451864052.001
Summary findings
- Aid volatility augments trade balance volatility.
- Foreign aid, with the important exception of years of adverse shocks, depresses exports.
- The adverse effects of aid volatility and Dutch disease can be mitigated through changes in net domestic assets of the central bank—a variable that reflects both monetary and fiscal policy.
- Macroeconomic policies can permanently affect real variables in the model developed by the authors.
- Macroeconomic policies can improve welfare if donors do not distribute foreign aid optimally over time.
Analytical framework and mechanisms
- A general equilibrium model is developed in which:
- The capital account is closed.
- Aid influences productivity growth through positive externalities (public expenditure) and negative externalities (Dutch disease).
- Net domestic assets of the central bank are used as a policy instrument that captures combined monetary and fiscal policy actions.
- The model implies that policy responses to aid flows can affect long-run real outcomes and welfare.
Policy implications and recommendations
- Use changes in net domestic assets of the central bank to mitigate:
- Trade balance volatility caused by aid volatility.
- Export depressions associated with foreign aid, except in years of adverse shocks.
- Design macroeconomic policies recognizing that:
- They can have permanent effects on real variables.
- They can partially offset suboptimal time-paths of aid distribution by donors, improving welfare.