Some Policy Lessons from Country Applications of the DIG and DIGNAR Models
IMF Working Papers, March 18, 2019
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Some Policy Lessons from Country Applications of the DIG and DIGNAR Models
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Daniel Gurara, Giovanni Melina, Luis-Felipe Zanna
- Published: March 18, 2019
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498302883.001
Summary / Overview
- Over the past seven years, the DIG and DIGNAR models have complemented the IMF and World Bank debt sustainability framework (DSF) analysis in over 65 country applications.
- The models have informed program and surveillance work through qualitative and quantitative analysis of the macroeconomic effects of public investment scaling-ups.
- The paper takes stock of model applications and extensions, and extracts five common policy lessons from the universe of country cases.
- The paper also discusses how these models were used to estimate the quantitative macroeconomic effects associated with these lessons.
Five common policy lessons (as stated)
- Improving public investment efficiency and/or raising the rate of return of public projects raises growth and lowers the risks associated with debt sustainability.
- Prudent and gradual investment scaling-ups are preferable to aggressive front-loaded ones, in terms of private sector crowding-out effects, absorptive capacity constraints, and debt sustainability risks.
- Domestic revenue mobilization helps create fiscal space for investment scaling-ups, by effectively containing public debt surges and their later-on repayments.
- Aid smoothens fiscal adjustments associated with public investment increases and may lower the risks of unsustainable debt.
- External savings mitigate Dutch disease macroeconomic effects and serve as fiscal buffers.
Model applications and quantitative analysis
- DIG and DIGNAR were applied in over 65 country cases to generate insights relevant for program design and surveillance.
- The models provided both qualitative and quantitative estimates of the macroeconomic effects of public investment scaling-ups, including implications for growth, private sector crowding-out, absorptive capacity, and debt trajectories.
- The paper documents how the models were used to estimate these quantitative macroeconomic effects associated with the five lessons.
Key subjects and thematic coverage
- Absorptive capacity
- Balance of payments
- Debt sustainability
- Expenditure
- External debt
- Fiscal consolidation
- Fiscal policy
- Public debt
- Public investment spending
Keywords (as listed)
- Absorptive capacity, crowding in, crowding-out effect, Debt Sustainability, Developing Countries., DIGNAR model, efficiency parameter, Fiscal consolidation, investment efficiency, investment program, investment scaling-up, investment-growth nexus, Natural resources, public investment, Public investment spending, rate of return, scaling-up plan, Small Open DSGE Models, Sub-Saharan Africa, West Africa, WP
Daniel Gurara, Giovanni Melina, and Luis-Felipe Zanna (March 18, 2019) — IMF Working Paper No. 2019/062.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper