Unintended Effects From the Expansion of the Non-Contributory Health System in Peru
IMF Working Papers, April 23, 2021
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Unintended Effects From the Expansion of the Non-Contributory Health System in Peru
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Jose L. Torres
- Published: April 23, 2021
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513572758.001
Overview
- Over the last two decades, the Peruvian government significantly augmented coverage of the non-contributory public health care system Seguro Integral de Salud (SIS).
- Expansion improved welfare and public health indicators by limiting the risk of catastrophic health-related costs for previously uninsured individuals and allowing for appropriate treatment of illnesses.
- Expansion also generated unintended consequences for informality, tax revenues, and GDP because a few formal agents bear costs for a service that the majority of (informal) agents receive for free.
Methodology
- A general equilibrium model calibrated for Peru is used to simulate the expansion of SIS and quantify unintended effects.
Key findings
- Overall welfare increases following the expansion of SIS.
- Informality rises by 2.7 percent.
- Tax revenues decrease by roughly 0.1 percent.
- Output (GDP) decreases by roughly 0.1 percent.
- The economic relevance of these aggregate results appears negligible given the extent of the expansion in eligibility.
- This muted aggregate impact arises because the expansion of coverage was mostly funded by reducing the spending per-insured person.
- If public spending is increased to improve quality of service given universal coverage, the model finds larger costs.
Policy implications and considerations
- Expanding non-contributory coverage can improve welfare and public health outcomes but may incentivize greater informality, producing small negative effects on tax revenues and output under the model calibration.
- Funding strategy matters: achieving universal coverage by reducing per-insured spending limits macroeconomic distortions but may compromise service quality.
- Increasing public spending to raise quality under universal coverage leads to larger fiscal and macroeconomic costs in the model, implying a trade-off between breadth of coverage and per-capita service quality.
Source: Unintended Effects From the Expansion of the Non-Contributory Health System in Peru, Jose L. Torres, April 23, 2021.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper