Working Together: Ireland and IMF
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Working Together: Ireland and IMF
Other formats
Background and narrative
- Ireland experienced a prolonged boom in the two decades ending in 2007, with economic growth averaging more than 6 percent a year.
- Rapid expansion attracted multinational firms (Dell, IBM, Coca-Cola, Google, Facebook) because of low corporate taxes, moderate wages, and a young, well-educated workforce, turning Ireland into an export platform.
- The boom generated hundreds of thousands of jobs and reversed long-term emigration trends, making Ireland a destination for immigrants.
- Personal account: Sean Hanaphy left college in 2005, earned 80,000 euro a year in construction, bought investment property, emigrated after the 2008 crash, and returned to work by early 2015; by 2017 unemployment had fallen to less than 7 percent from a peak of more than 15 percent in 2011.
Causes and mechanics of the crisis
- A real estate bubble formed as property values more than quadrupled in the decade ending in 2006, fueled by rising incomes and cheap credit after adopting the euro.
- By 2006, construction accounted for more than 12 percent of employment, the highest proportion among advanced economies.
- Bank lending standards weakened as domestic and foreign banks competed; bank assets grew to five times Ireland’s GDP, mostly funded on wholesale markets rather than domestic deposits.
- The global financial turmoil beginning in 2007 cooled demand; property prices fell, construction halted, and “ghost estates” proliferated.
- Tax revenue plunged 20 percent in just two years while spending on social services rose, producing a severe fiscal strain.
- On September 30, 2008, the Irish government guaranteed liabilities of the six major banks.
- The government injected 46 billion euros into banks, equivalent to 30 percent of GDP, and nationalized two banks including Anglo-Irish Bank.
- In the last four months of 2010, 60 billion euros, equal to over one-third of GDP, flowed out of Ireland; banks relied on emergency loans from the European Central Bank.
International assistance and program design
- In November 2010, Ireland sought help from the European Union and the IMF.
- The EU and IMF provided loans totaling 67.5 billion euros—equal to 40 percent of Ireland’s economy—to be paid out over the next three years.
- A “troika” (IMF, European Central Bank, European Commission) provided technical assistance; IMF staff teams based in Dublin worked closely with Irish authorities.
- IMF recommended an independent assessment of bank loan losses; BlackRock Solutions was hired to identify the size of the banking-sector hole.
Banking-sector resolution measures and outcomes
- An additional 24 billion euros was required to fill the hole in the banking system.
- Measures taken:
- Banks were merged and staffing reduced.
- Assets were sold to better align banks with deposit funding.
- Two nationalized banks were wound down and liquidated.
- A National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) was tasked with recovering large commercial property loans.
- NAMA issued some 30.2 billion euro of senior debt to banks for those loans; that debt was redeemed by the end of 2017, three years ahead of schedule.
- Bank of Ireland and Allied Irish Bank returned to profitability in 2013 and 2014.
- More than 100,000 borrowers had gone into arrears; arrears stopped rising by mid-2013, loan restructurings increased in 2013-15, and the number with arrears is down by almost half.
- The IMF and partners brought in international experts (Norway, United States) and recommended a new bankruptcy law and upgraded bank capacities for loan modification and debt collection.
Fiscal consolidation and social measures
- Pre-program Irish measures included a 14 percent cut in public-sector wages in 2009, yielding savings equivalent to 6.2 percent of GDP from 2008 to 2010.
- Ahead of the troika program, the government prepared a plan to reduce the budget deficit from 2011 to 2014 while maintaining essential services and protecting the poor.
- Fiscal measures implemented:
- Increases in value-added tax and carbon and motor vehicle taxes.
- Introduction of the Universal Social Charge (a supplementary personal income tax).
- Reductions in the number of public servants.
- Savings in capital spending.
- These fiscal steps amounted to 8 percent of GDP, with two-thirds of the adjustment on the spending side.
- The government largely preserved welfare spending to cushion vulnerable groups.
- IMF staff engaged in public communication: press conferences and meetings with union leaders, opposition politicians, and non-governmental organizations to build public support.
Recovery trajectory and indicators
- By the end of 2012, in the second year of the program, the economy began to turn around with firms hiring and investing and unemployment slowly declining.
- The government re-entered financial markets in mid-2012 by selling short-term notes and later bond issues as interest rates subsided.
- Home prices in Dublin began to recover.
- Individual outcomes: Sean Hanaphy returned to Ireland in early 2015; by 2017 he secured a 700,000-euro construction contract employing 14 people and resolved his mortgage issues.
References