IMF, FSB and BIS publish Elements of Effective Macroprudential Policies
IMF News, August 31, 2016
Source details
- Canonical URL
- IMF, FSB and BIS publish Elements of Effective Macroprudential Policies
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: August 31, 2016
Overview
- Publication released on August 31, 2016.
- Press Release No. 16/386.
- Joint publication by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Financial Stability Board (FSB) and Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
- Responds to a G20 request and will be presented to the G20 Leaders’ Summit in Hangzhou.
- Press contact: PRESS OFFICER: Randa Elnagar; Phone: +1 202 623-7100; Email: MEDIA@IMF.org.
Purpose and context
- Takes stock of international experience since the global financial crisis in developing and implementing macroprudential policies.
- Responds to a G20 request in 2010 for the three organisations to report on progress; the three organisations produced a progress report on Macroprudential Policy Tools and Frameworks in 2011.
- Notes that many countries have introduced frameworks and tools aimed at limiting systemic risks that could otherwise disrupt the provision of financial services and damage the real economy.
Main findings and observations
- Experience with macroprudential policy is growing and is complemented by an increasing body of empirical research on the effectiveness of macroprudential tools.
- Evidence remains tentative because the experience does not yet span a full financial cycle.
- “The wide range of institutional arrangements and policies being adopted across countries suggest that there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’. Nonetheless, accumulated experience highlights – and this paper documents – a number of elements that have been found useful for macroprudential policy making,” the publication says.
Elements found useful for macroprudential policymaking (as documented)
- A clear mandate that forms the basis for assigning responsibility for taking macroprudential policy decisions.
- Adequate institutional foundations for macroprudential policy frameworks. Many of the observed designs give the main mandate to an influential body with a broad view of the entire financial system.
- Well-defined objectives and powers that can foster the ability and willingness to act.
- Transparency and accountability mechanisms to establish legitimacy and create commitment to take action.
- Measures to promote cooperation and information-sharing between domestic authorities.
- A comprehensive framework for analysing and monitoring systemic risk as well as efforts to close information gaps.
- A broad range of policy tools to address systemic risk over time and from across the financial system.
- The ability to calibrate policy responses to risks, including by considering the costs and benefits, addressing any leakages, and evaluating responses. In financially integrated economies, this includes assessing potential cross-border effects.
Additional contents of the document
- Some data on the use of macroprudential tools.
- Illustrative examples of institutional models for macroprudential policymaking.
- A brief summary of some of the empirical literature on the effectiveness of macroprudential tools.
Notes to editors
- The work of the IMF, FSB and BIS in this area responds to a G20 request in 2010 for the three organisations to report on progress achieved in this area.
- The three organisations produced a progress report on Macroprudential Policy Tools and Frameworks in 2011 which highlighted the need for further analysis on macroprudential tools.
- For further information on the BIS, visit www.bis.org.
- For further information on the FSB, visit www.fsb.org.
- For further information on the IMF, visit www.imf.org.
- For further information on the IMF and the G20, visit www.imf.org/external/np/g20/.
Source: IMF, FSB and BIS press release, Press Release No. 16/386, August 31, 2016.