On October 3, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a modification of the mechanism governing interest rate setting
of PRGT facilities and set the interest rates to zero on all Fund concessional loans under the PRGT for the next two years through end-December 2018. Under
the modified mechanism, rates will continue to be set at zero for as long as and whenever global interest rates are low. This provides continued support to
LICs amidst the current challenging global environment. The modification introduces an additional threshold for the SDR reference rate and sets the
interest rates on the Standby Credit Facility (SCF) and the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) to zero if the SDR reference rate is lower than or equal to 0.75
percent. The Executive Board also decided to waive interest rate charges on outstanding balances under the Exogenous Shocks Facility until the next review
of the interest rate mechanism in 2018. The Executive Board had previously endorsed temporary relief of interest payments on all outstanding concessional
loans for PRGT-eligible members in 2009, waiving all interest payments on PRGT loans through December 2011. It also agreed thrice to extend the exceptional
interest rate waiver, first to end‑December 2012, next to end-2014, and then again to end-2016, providing interest rate relief to many LICs at a time when
they face considerable headwinds from the global economic environment. Continual waivers would no longer be needed as the modification makes zero rates an
integral part of the interest rate mechanism in periods of very low global interest rates, as at present, thereby preserving the concessional nature of
PRGT financing.
Executive Board Assessment
[1]
Executive Directors welcomed the opportunity to review the interest rate structure for loans under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT) and the
mechanism established in 2009, which differentiates interest rates among PRGT facilities and links these interest rates to developments in world interest
rates.
Directors noted that since the PRGT mechanism was adopted, the SDR interest rate has remained well below the 2 percent threshold. The application of the
2009 interest rate mechanism would imply that the interest rate on the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) be set at zero percent for
2017–18, and the rate on the Standby Credit Facility (SCF) at 0.25 percent. Remaining credit under the Exogenous Shocks Facility (ESF), which is not part
of the interest rate mechanism, would be charged 0.25 percent upon expiration of the interest rate waiver at end December 2016.
Directors noted that the successive waivers on PRGT interest have benefited many low income member countries as they faced a challenging global
environment. During the previous review, many Directors had also noted that the possibility of a prolonged period of very low interest rates called for an
early re-examination of the interest rate mechanism, including an exit strategy from repeated application of the waiver, to safeguard the self-sustaining
capacity of the PRGT.
Directors agreed that a strong case remains for maintaining zero rates on the Fund’s concessional credit, given the lack of improvement in the global
economic outlook for low income countries and significant downside risks from lower commodity prices, weak external demand, and tighter financial
conditions. They noted that market expectations of the timing and pace of interest rate normalization have been substantially revised down, possibly
prolonging the period of very low interest rates. Directors observed that, under a very low interest rate environment, the application of the interest
mechanism would result in some PRGT borrowers paying a rate on their outstanding concessional credit exceeding the PRGT’s cost of funding such credits,
contrary to the concessional nature of the PRGT.
Given the aforementioned factors, Directors supported preserving the concessional nature of PRGT financing in periods of very low global interest rates. To
this end, the staff proposed a modification of the 2009 interest rate mechanism, introducing an additional threshold of 0.75 percent, below which the SCF
interest rate would be set to zero, along with the ECF rate which would remain at zero until the SDR interest rate reaches 2.0 percent. As a result, both
the SCF and ECF interest rates will be locked in at zero for 2017–18, and will stay at zero as long as and whenever global interest rates are very low,
without requiring continual interest rate waivers. A few Directors stated that there should be an explicit agreement now on a zero interest rate for the
ECF and SCF through 2020. Directors shared the view that, given current market expectations, the modified interest rate mechanism will likely keep all PRGT
interest rates at zero through at least 2020, and agreed that, if the mechanism were to generate a different outcome, it would be reassessed in 2018. In
addition, Directors also supported staff’s proposal to extend the zero interest rates charged on outstanding balances under the ESF for the period 2017–18.
Most Directors expressed the view that the merits and implications of unifying the interest rate structure for the SCF and ECF should be examined on a
comprehensive basis and as one element of the planned review of PRGT facilities in 2018. A number of Directors proposed conducting consultations on this
issue in 2017. A few felt unification should happen now. Many other Directors supported or were open to unifying the interest rate structure for the SCF
and the ECF, with a few of these Directors observing that the differentiated interest rate structure in the mechanism was, inter alia, inconsistent with
the practice in the GRA where SBAs and EFFs carry the same rate of charge. Directors emphasized the importance of preserving the self‑sustaining PRGT
framework as future proposals for revising PRGT related policies are considered.
The next review of the PRGT interest rate mechanism is scheduled to take place by December 31, 2018, providing Directors an opportunity to assess the
implications of the mechanism in light of actual interest rate developments and economic challenges facing LICs at that time, and the findings of the
facilities review.