Disclosure and Data on Climate Change
IMF News, April 1, 2021
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Disclosure and Data on Climate Change
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: April 1, 2021
Overview
- Remarks by Tobias Adrian, Financial Counsellor and Director of the Monetary and Capital Markets Department, IMF.
- Event: New Economy Forum, 2021 Spring Meetings.
- Date: April 1, 2021.
- Purpose: Outline the IMF’s perspective and priorities on climate-related disclosures, data gaps, and the information architecture needed to assess climate risks to the financial system.
Urgency and systemic relevance of climate risks
- Climate risks are framed as an "urgent global imperative" with potential for "catastrophic global scenarios" that could have "devastating effects on societies, economies, and the financial system."
- The COVID crisis illustrates how extreme "tail events" can cause extensive disruption of economic activity and informs approaches to assessing climate risks.
- The IMF has made understanding implications of climate change for the global financial system and financial stability an important additional priority.
Financial-stability implications and supervisory priorities
- Climate-related disclosures matter for:
- Financial stability assessments.
- Informed market pricing of physical and transition risks.
- Growth of sustainable finance.
- Stress-testing, sensitivity analysis, and scenario analysis are identified as important tools to assess potential financial implications of climate risk.
- Over the past decade, "one in five Financial Sector Assessment Programs (FSAPs) conducted by the IMF contained an examination of climate-related physical risks, with transition risks becoming an increasing focus."
- Regulatory and supervisory frameworks should be strengthened to ensure:
- Supervisors identify and monitor key exposures of financial institutions to climate-related financial risks.
- Clear expectations are set for governance and management of those risks by financial institutions.
- Taking the global dimension into consideration will be increasingly important given the financial-stability implications of climate change.
Information architecture needed to assess climate risks
- The IMF views the information architecture around climate risks as consisting of three components:
1. Reliable and high-quality data. 2. A harmonized and consistent set of climate disclosure standards. 3. A broadly agreed upon global taxonomy.
- Data:
- The IMF is active through:
- Co-chairing the Network for Greening the Financial System’s "Bridging the Data Gaps (BDG) Workstream".
- Internal work on developing a database on climate indicators.
- Bridging climate-related data gaps is challenging due to issues of data availability, reliability, and comparability.
- The NGFS BDG has adopted a user-centric approach based on:
- Categorizing use cases.
- Classification of metrics.
- Links to data sources.
- The IMF’s workplan to develop climate-change indicators for macroeconomic analysis will complement NGFS work and address a subset of BDG-identified data gaps.
- Climate disclosures:
- The current space is "fragmented" with multiple frameworks, creating an "urgent need for convergence toward a harmonized and consistent set of climate disclosure standards."
- The IMF strongly supports the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s initiative on global sustainability reporting standards to align with financial reporting and assurance by auditors.
- The IMF commends the alliance of leading standard-setters on sustainability for developing prototype standards.
- The IMF encourages use of insights from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) as a framework to build on; TCFD "has gained strong support" and "can serve as a basis for greater climate-related disclosures."
- Outstanding issues include:
- Pathways to mandatory adoption.
- Approaches on materiality.
- Interaction with jurisdictional approaches.
- Scope of what is covered within climate disclosure standards.
- Taxonomies:
- Steps toward globally agreed-upon taxonomies are "probably less advanced," though efforts by the European Union and others are notable.
- Given the absence of harmonized metrics that accurately measure climate-change-related risks and opportunities, taxonomies can:
- Facilitate information about climate risk to investors.
- Foster sustainable finance markets.
- Help monitor financial risks associated with climate change.
- A minimum agreed-upon global taxonomy combined with good quality data would enhance effectiveness and quality of disclosure.
- Identifying opportunities for convergence toward a common taxonomy is important to ensure consistency and a consolidated and uniform framework for climate-related disclosures.
IMF roles, collaboration, and expected outcomes
- The IMF’s roles highlighted:
- Participation in NGFS BDG as co-chair.
- Internal development of a database on climate indicators.
- Development of a workplan for climate-change indicators for macroeconomic analysis.
- Support for convergence on disclosure standards and taxonomies.
- Collaboration across jurisdictions, standard-setters, private sector, and international organizations is emphasized.
- The goal is to build a climate-resilient financial system globally by focusing on key priorities, coordinating efforts, and delivering necessary outcomes.
Key findings and priorities (bulleted)
- Climate risks can cause "catastrophic global scenarios" with systemic effects.
- Experience from COVID underscores relevance of analyzing extreme "tail events" for climate risk assessment.
- One in five FSAPs over the past decade included examination of climate-related physical risks; transition risks are an increasing focus.
- Three critical components of information architecture: data, disclosure standards, global taxonomy.
- IMF actively contributes to BDG and is developing climate indicators for macroeconomic analysis.
- Support for IFRS Foundation’s initiative on global sustainability reporting standards and use of TCFD insights.
- Need to resolve issues on mandatory adoption, materiality, jurisdictional interaction, and scope of disclosure standards.
- Need for convergence toward a common taxonomy to improve consistency and disclosure quality.
Remarks by Tobias Adrian, Financial Counsellor and Director of the Monetary and Capital Markets Department, IMF; New Economy Forum, 2021 Spring Meetings; April 1, 2021.