IMF Working Papers

Employment Protection Deregulation and Labor Shares in Advanced Economies

By Gabriele Ciminelli, Romain A Duval, Davide Furceri

August 16, 2018

Download PDF

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Gabriele Ciminelli, Romain A Duval, and Davide Furceri. Employment Protection Deregulation and Labor Shares in Advanced Economies, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 2018) accessed December 12, 2024

Disclaimer: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Summary

Labor market deregulation, intended to boost productivity and employment, is one plausible, yet little studied, driver of the decline in labor shares that took place across most advanced economies since the early 1990s. This paper assesses the impact of job protection deregulation in a sample of 26 advanced economies over the period 1970-2015, using a newly constructed dataset of major reforms to employment protection legislation for regular contracts. We apply the local projection method to estimate the dynamic response of the labor share to our reform events at both the country and the country-industry levels. For the latter, we employ a differences-in-differences identification strategy using two identifying assumptions grounded in theory—namely that job protection deregulation should have larger negative effects in industries characterized by (i) a higher “natural” propensity to adjust the workforce, and (ii) a lower elasticity of substitution between capital and labor. We find a statistically significant, economically large and robust negative effect of deregulation on the labor share. In particular, illustrative back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that job protection deregulation may have contributed about 15 percent to the average labor share decline in advanced economies. Together with existing evidence regarding the macroeconomic gains from job protection and other labor market reforms, our results also point to the need for policymakers to address efficiency-equity trade-offs when designing such reforms.

Subject: Employment, Employment protection, Labor, Labor markets, Labor share, Real wages

Keywords: Confidence interval, Deregulation, Employment, Employment Protection, EPL deregulation, EPL reform, Global, Labor Market, Labor Share, Layoff rate, Real wage, Real wages, Reform dummy, Reports estimate, Structural Reforms, Time series, WP

Publication Details

  • Pages:

    72

  • Volume:

    ---

  • DOI:

    ---

  • Issue:

    ---

  • Series:

    Working Paper No. 2018/186

  • Stock No:

    WPIEA2018186

  • ISBN:

    9781484370087

  • ISSN:

    1018-5941