Structural Reform Priorities for Brazil
IMF Working Papers, October 8, 2018
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Structural Reform Priorities for Brazil
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Nina Biljanovska, Damiano Sandri
- Published: October 8, 2018
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484376331.001
Summary
- Over the last few decades, Brazil has experienced relatively weak economic growth due to stagnant productivity.
- To boost productivity, Brazil should embark on an ambitious structural reform process while selecting a few reform priorities to avoid dispersing political capital on an overly broad reform agenda.
- The paper identifies Brazil’s reform priorities in two steps:
- It estimates the impact that different reforms have on Brazil’s productivity.
- It analyzes survey data to assess the extent of public support for reforms.
- The results show that banking sector reforms would generate the largest productivity gains and have the highest level of public support; they would also be relatively easy to legislate and generate significant fiscal savings.
Findings on productivity impacts
- Banking sector reforms yield the largest productivity gains.
- Other reform areas analyzed (implied by subject keywords) include labor market reforms, legal system, and measures addressing monopoly power and state intervention.
- Focus on total factor productivity and production as central outcomes.
Public support and political economy
- Survey analysis is used to assess public support for reforms.
- Banking sector reforms score highest on public support and political feasibility ("relatively easy to legislate").
Policy recommendations
- Select a small number of high-impact reforms rather than pursuing an overly broad reform agenda.
- Prioritize banking sector reforms given their combination of:
- Largest estimated productivity gains.
- Highest level of public support.
- Relative ease of legislation.
- Potential for significant fiscal savings.
Content in this bundle
- Structural Reform Priorities for Brazil, WP/18/224, October 2018