From Basel I to Basel III: Sequencing Implementation in Developing Economies
IMF Working Papers, June 14, 2019
Source details
- Canonical URL
- From Basel I to Basel III: Sequencing Implementation in Developing Economies
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Caio Ferreira, Nigel Jenkinson, Christopher Wilson
- Published: June 14, 2019
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498315227.001
Summary
- Developing economies can strengthen their financial systems by implementing the main elements of global regulatory reform.
- Effective prudential frameworks may require adapting international standards to account for:
- the sophistication and size of financial institutions,
- the relevance of different financial operations in their market,
- the granularity of information available,
- the capacity of supervisors.
- Under a proportionate application of the Basel standards, smaller institutions with less complex business models would be subject to a simpler regulatory framework that enhances resilience without generating disproportionate compliance costs.
- The paper provides guidance on how non-Basel Committee member countries could incorporate banks’ capital and liquidity standards into their framework.
- The analysis builds on the authors’ experience providing technical assistance on—and assessing compliance with—international standards in banking supervision.
Findings and guidance
- Adaptation factors to consider when implementing Basel standards:
- institution sophistication and size,
- market relevance of financial operations,
- information granularity,
- supervisory capacity.
- Proportionate application:
- smaller, less complex institutions → simpler regulatory framework,
- objective → enhance financial-sector resilience while avoiding disproportionate compliance costs.
- Specific focus areas:
- incorporation of banks’ capital standards,
- incorporation of liquidity standards,
- sequencing of implementation appropriate for non-Basel Committee member countries.
Policy recommendations
- Tailor international Basel standards to local market and institutional characteristics rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach.
- Apply a proportionate regulatory framework so regulatory complexity scales with institution complexity and systemic relevance.
- Prioritize capacity-building in supervisors and information systems to support effective implementation of capital and liquidity standards.
- Sequence implementation to allow non-Basel Committee member countries to incorporate core capital and liquidity requirements progressively, leveraging technical assistance and compliance assessments.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper